<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Love Me Tender</title>
		<description>Comments for Love Me Tender at http://www.18to88.com , comment 1 to 14 out of 14 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.18to88.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:45:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9038</link>
			<description>Fixed (in both places)

Sorry - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:32:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Your link in the article actually takes me</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9036</link>
			<description>to the Old Manning article instead of the CBA primer, and come to think of it, so does the link on the sidebar. What happened to that article? - Cass</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:31:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Brock Situation...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9015</link>
			<description>Now that you explain it, it makes perfect sense.  It was driving me crazy, as to why he was asking for his release with all that money on the table. - Doug England</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:30:21 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9011</link>
			<description>Nice work bro.

I'd like to point out that prior to the 2007 season, the Miami Dolphins chose to tender the 1.8M and 2nd round pick to Wes Welker rather than the 2.6M and the 1st round pick.

Why?  Nobody has been able to determine how an NFL office could manage something that stupid.

Is Welker not worth committing an extra 800K to and potentially receiving a 1st round pick for him?  

Was that 800K THAT important to their cap situation at the time?  I seriously doubt it.

But that's one example - and a damn good one - of a front office making a huge blunder during the tendering process to restricted free agents.

200+ catches and however many first downs later.....I'm sure they regret not slapping him with the 1st round tender.

My two cents. - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:59:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9009</link>
			<description>Saw that. It is a total and bizarre waste of money.  

He isn't worth $4 million. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:05:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>interesting Chargers news</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9008</link>
			<description>http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4966109 - m@chu</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:02:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9007</link>
			<description>Brock's contract had another year left.  He was slated to make 3.8 million, plus another 500 K for a roster bonus.  

His release has not been confirmed.

I don't believe he would be eligible for the compensatory pick equation if he did leave, because he was released rather than free due to his contract expiring.   - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:57:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GB is close</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9006</link>
			<description>and as of about a half hour ago:  http://bit.ly/90uY2r - m@chu</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:47:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9005</link>
			<description>thanks for posting this tonight ... all the 'news' of late had me jonesing for the blanks to be filled in, so to speak.

I agree w/walt - I want to see Muir &amp; Mookie stick around

So re: Brock ... if the Colts didn't release him, they would have received a compensatory pick, correct? just another example of class organizational move, or was his contract up? - m@chu</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:46:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9004</link>
			<description>A 2nd rounder for CJ, would probably be good enough to get Saffold. - shake n bake</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:04:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9002</link>
			<description>Of the guys remaining, I tend to hope we get deals done for Muir and AJ. That would be some major change at DT if not. Also, I kinda hope we retain Hagler.

Keiaho and Rushing, I'm not sure. - coltsfanawalt</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:30:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>That's what I thought.</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-9000</link>
			<description>I'd love to see him get that offer for the sake of the draft pick, but I'll be glad also to have him on the team for depth. Hopefully we can get a better LT and use Johnson anywhere else he's needed.    - coltsfanawalt</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:17:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-8999</link>
			<description>That's a good level for him. If anyone wants him, they are welcome to him at that level.  He's a useful guy, but a 2nd pick would be sweet. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:04:46 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>I get too attached to people. I'm gonna miss Brock.</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/march/love-me-tender.html#comment-8997</link>
			<description>Reports are that Charlie Johnson has now received a second round tender as well. - coltsfanawalt</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:59:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

