Comments for Eyes in the Backfield-Jets (Playoffs) at http://www.18to88.com , comment 1 to 13 out of 13 comments http://www.18to88.com Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:58:02 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7063 if powers doesn't play as it looks like he wont jennings playing causes me plenty of concern. hopefully he doesn't get matched up with braylon on one of the deep attempts that the jets like to run as it could be one of the big plays that could kill us. of course he could just drop it anyway but it is a bit of a concern - buzz Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:07:58 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7060 Couple of random thoughts (not 18 and not as well written) the night before 1) If the Jets move Revis around like they did on chargers instead of locking him on wayne manning will have a field day. He isnt going to get fooled by the same trickery that rivers did and he will target wayne consistently when revis is off of him. I think the jets will try this to a degree but will probably learn and limit it later in the game. 2)Im not as afraid of the run game as the MSM seems to think we should be. Seems weird coming from the colts but this run defense is solidly good. I would be surprised if the Jets go over 4.2 ypc. They may get 120 yards but that will be due to a lot of carries. 3) To get those big yards rushing they should rush up the middle. Jones and Greene aren't fast enough to get around our speed. 4) Would be a big help to get help on at least 3 big plays from run game. Whether that is a TD from a few yards out or a 10+ yard run that would go a long way in securing a win. 5)How the run game converts on 3rd down will be huge. 6)I think the jets need to give a lot of blitz looks and drop most back into coverage. Especially to try to disrupt some of the over the middle short passes we run. This seemed pretty open for the chargers but they couldn't take advantage of it. 7) The brad smith "tiger cat" will not work at all. I hope they try it 5+ times. Obviously any play can work any given time but i don't see this having any type of success rate against the speed of our defense. Same with all the sanchez roll outs they run. I can see him getting blown up on at least one of those if they run a couple tomorrow. 8) I expect the defense to keep the jets offense in check. I'm kind of thinking 3 fgs. Im a little more concerned about the offense (yes there is a first time for everything) so i will go with 17 for them. If we play 100 times i think the average score is probably 23-16 and we win about 75% of the time. But the biggest issue could be the big play. If the Jets have 2 more big plays than us it is going to be a battle and then some. - buzz Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:31:49 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7038 Excellent analysis from FO: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/game-previews/2010/afc-conference-championship-preview - Crizzle Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:56:44 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7032 I'm feeling a shutout dealt to the Jets. I think the Colts D has heard just about enough yapping... - hmrstrm45 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:23:24 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7026 We'll know it's over when the FAT guy sings. Make sure to turn down the volume cuz theres going to be some N.Y. tears. - Dan Smith Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:00:57 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7020 I'm sorry, what were we talking about here? - coltsfanawalt Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:08:26 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7015 hearty laugh out of me from #11. Good work. - thejoshbaker Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:09:49 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7014 I love the smell of napalm in the morning, it smells like victory. More confident than yesterday, Colts 24 - Jets 13. Jets will only score 6 real points and pick up a garbage touchdown near the end. - Merr Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:09:44 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7013 "Never stop! Never stop fighting 'til the fight is done ..." Or read it in Manning's voice as he's left the field after all of the victories this year, esp. the come from behind. Big props Bob for pulling out one of my all time favorites. - m@chu Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:13:55 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7011 Just like a Dago to bring a knife to a gunfight. (Must be read with Connery's voice in your head) 24-9 or 24-10...can't decide if they score a TD or not. I'll split the diff: 24-9.5 - Bob M Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:34:39 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7006 Demond likes the Colts to win 23 - 13. - DemondSanders Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:18:56 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7003 The Jets aren't so much Cinderella as they are Dulcinea, whose beauty and virtue is mostly a figment of the imagination of Rex Quixote, tilting at Colts windmills with his trusty sidekick, Sanchez Panza. - Chip Bennett Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:26:49 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/eyes-in-the-backfield-jets-playoffs.html#comment-7001 I feel sorry for the Jets fans who have followed old Rex Ryan on this 'damn-fool idealistic crusade'... The Indy offense can make point-five past light speed. It might not look like much, but they've got it where it counts. DZ: "It's not wise to blitz Peyton Manning.." JETSfan: "But, no one worries about blitzing Mark Sanchez-" DZ: "That's because Mark Sanchez doesn't have a 100+ QB rating against the blitz... Manning is known to do that." JETSfan: "I see your point.. I suggest a new strategy Rex, let the Manning win" Okay okay, I'm done... - Garrison Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:46:30 +0100