Comments for Extending the Metaphor at http://www.18to88.com , comment 1 to 21 out of 20 comments http://www.18to88.com Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:58:14 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6177 To me it's this catch: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C67pGdr4v0g[/url] Love it. - gizzardfanny Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:49:02 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6172 @Bionicman That was one of the best comments ever left here. Great work - DZ Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:35:23 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6169 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZHaKGDYspE 2:18 Makes you all teary-eyed - JohnD Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:44:50 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6168 I would pay big money for an NFL-produced highlight video of Peyton & Marvin. I won't buy cable, I won't buy more than 1 or 2 movies on DVD a year, but I'd pay 3 figures for that. - JohnD Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:19:31 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6167 I know I'm not the only one who still finds himself sitting in a dark room, from time to time, rocking back and forth watching this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK2RVbzOHQ4 - DemondSanders Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:04:08 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6166 Marvin caught 95 balls for nearly 1400 yards in 2006. His skills didn't actually decline until Joe Addai ran up his backside in 2007 causing the injury that eventually ended his career. But, to your point, the Colts did get signficantly better once Wayne and Clark entered their prime. - DemondSanders Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:00:00 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6165 I felt like the Colts got better in the postseason as Marvin's skills declined and Peyton started relying on Wayne and Clark to carry the receiving load. That seemed to really get going in 2006. - MattW Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:54:51 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6164 I like where the Colts and Saints are right now. Nobody (okay that's a relative term) is buying them even though they both won 13 games to start the season. Don't sleep on them. - DemondSanders Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:11:21 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6163 "Painter...um...wore a helmet. " Barely. I thought his head and helmet were coming off on that sack-fumble-touchdown by the Jets. Also, something that probably helps (at least emotionally for the younger guys) is a coach on the staff who has led 2 of the biggest comebacks in football history. Frank Reich. Of course that just adds to the other veteran leadership, but has to make the team feel better, in addition to Peyton and the 7 CFB wins this year. If only he can pass some of that magic juice to Painter if tragedy happens. Bulger didn't get inured trying to make the tackle, it was bad luck. The return was coming to the side of the field he was on, and LBs are coached that if that situation arises, put a good block on the QB to rattle him. He just got REALLY blocked by (i think it was) Brackett. I still feel better about the whole team this year rather than 2005. I loved the talent that was present in 2005. June, Edge, Marv, Tarik Glenn, the Zombie, Rhodes etc. They were all valuable players that we don't have now. I just think that we have a better 'team' and the team concept this year. - bubbadeez Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:06:10 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6162 Well, if Nick Harper gets stabbed the night before the game, then we are in big trouble. People forget what a huge factor that was, as Harper limped around and got burnt in the first half. He was not himself. That, and the fact that the offensive line didn't show up to play, and Howard Mudd decided to try to block Joey Porter with Ryan Lilja. Not sure what Manning's mobility had to do with any of that. - Ronnell Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:59:33 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6160 I've got a theory that may not agree with conventional wisdom, but which I think explains things well: [b]Every good QB the 2005 Colts faced had a good game against them.[/b]The statistics for 2005 Colts defense were inflated by QB injuries, the offense, and an easy schedule. Let's go through it game by game, with games against QB's that were good that season bolded. Week 1, Ravens, 24-7: The Colts defense first faced Kyle Boller (need I say more?), and after he got injured, they faced Anthony Wright (a journeyman who played 9 games for the Ravens and finished with a 71.7 QB rating). Week 2, Jaguars, 10-3: The Colts faced Byron Leftwich, who had a pretty good year by his standards (89.3 rating) but wasn't especially good, and mostly managed the game (probably would have finished the season with under 3,000 yards). I'll give the Colts some credit for this, though they got gashed by the run (5.6 YPC). Week 3, Browns, 13-6: The Colts faced Trent Dilfer and an offense that finished near the bottom of the league in scoring. Week 4, Titans, 31-10: The 4-12 Titans entire team, including the offense, was weak, and Steve McNair's 82.4 rating on the season helped lead to his release. Still, he had a decent game (28/37, 220, 1 TD, 1 INT). Week 5, 49ers, 28-3: The Colts faced rookie Alex Smith in his first start, in the year that (according to Football Outsiders) Smith had the single worst season by any QB ever. [b]Week 6, Rams, 45-28:[/b] This is where you start having to pay attention. Marc Bulger and the Rams offense started the game red hot. Bulger was 6/8 with 121 yards, 1 TD, and 1 INT, with passes of 36 and 57 yards on TD drives. Steven Jackson had 62 yards and a TD on 8 carries. Then, when Bulger threw an interception, he got injured trying to make the tackle, forcing backup Jamie Martin into the game. At that point, the Rams were leading 17-0. In 2006, Martin threw 24 passes as a backup, then didn't get in a game in 2007-2008 before retiring. Week 7, Texans, 38-20: David Carr was having one of his typical bad seasons (77.2 rating), and in this game he threw 9 (yes, 9) passes compared to 28 runs, in a game where the Colts never trailed. [b]Week 9, Patriots, 40-21:[/b] Remember this game? The Monday night game where the Colts stomped their long-time nemesis in New England? What you may have forgotten is that Brady had an incredible game, going 22/33 for 265 yards and 3 TD's with no INT's (though he did have a fumble recovered by his team). The reason the Patriots lost was an unbelievable performance by the Colts offense, which dominated so much that Belichick attempted an onside kick in the middle of the third quarter. Week 10, Texans, 31-17: The Texans actually let Carr pass in this one, but were reminded that he was, in fact, still David Carr. [b]Week 11, Bengals, 45-37:[/b] Do I need to say anything? Carson Palmer (back when he was good) was 25/38, with 335 yards, 2 TD, and 1 INT. The Bengals running backs added 158 yards on 6.6 YPC running. [b]Week 12, Steelers, 26-7:[/b] Colts fans often talk of how well the defense played in this game. Often forgotten is that this was the first game Ben Roethlisberger (17/26, 133 YDS, 1 TD, 2 INT) played in after missing 3 games with a concussion. The combination of rust and remaining symptoms could have made the Colts defense look better than they were. Week 13, Titans, 35-3: McNair was 22/33, 220 yards, no TD or INT, 1 fumble for Colts TD. Week 14, Jaguars, 26-18: The Jaguars started David Garrard, who went 26/35 for 250 yards and a TD, which in itself isn't great. The kicker is that the Colts had truly insane fumble luck, with tight end Kyle Brady fumbling 3 times in the game, with the Colts recovering twice. Add in a Garrard fumble on a QB sneak that the Colts recovered, and a good offensive performance, and the result was a game where what Football Outsiders would call non-repeatable events made the defense look good. [b]Week 15, Chargers, 17-26:[/b] Most of us remember this. The Chargers came out passing, and dominated the Colts pass defense in the first quarter. Brees finished 22/33, 255 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT, 1 fumble, though those stats don't show how well the Chargers moved, including an 8 minute drive in the second quarter that ended in a FG. [b]Week 16, Seahawks, 13-28:[/b] The resting of starters makes this game hard to evaluate, though the Seahawks scored 14 points against starters and possibly 7 against some starters. Hasselbeck was 17/21, 168 yards, 2 TD, though again the resting makes it hard to evaluate. Week 17, Cardinals, 17-13: Josh McCown vs backups. Not much to look at. [b]Playoffs, Steelers, 18-21:[/b] We all remember the result, and most remember the way the Steelers passed all over the Colts in the first quarter. What's forgotten is that Roethlisberger suffered a triceps injury in the second half that limited his throwing. Add in the fact that the Steelers went into a conservative shell after getting a lead, and the take-away is that they could have done even more on offense. Put it all together. The Colts defense had one good game against a good QB in , against an injured Roethlisberger in Week 12, and we all saw how he did when he was healthy. The Texans were 2-14, the Titans were 4-12, and both had weak offenses. Three teams the Colts faced (Browns, Ravens, 49ers) had utterly abysmal offenses. The starters weren't tested against the best NFC passing team they faced (the Seahawks) due to resting, and they got to face the backup QB for most of the Rams game. Quite simply, a combination of easy opposition (Ravens, Browns, 49ers, Texans and Titans twice), QB injuries (Bulger, Roethlisberger), and dominant performances by the offense (Patriots) made the defense look better than it really was. In truth, against teams that could pass well, it was exposed. - Bionicman Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:09:57 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6159 (As I've said before, I'm convinced that the death of Coach Dungy's son emotionally crippled the '05 team.) But that being said, I just don't think the '09 Peyton will let a game happen like the 2005 Steelers game. Meaning that Peyton will quickly figure out whatever the Ravens throw at him and be able to attack it. (Whereas in 2005, for whatever reason, the offense never got in synch.) - Doug England Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:58:01 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6158 and it shows in the 7 CFB wins this season. The Colts are never out of a game, there is no panic. They might or might not be better than 05 (probably not) but their intangibles make up for it. 100% agreed on Manning throwing on the move and moving around within the pocket. There were clearly times when the Colts were the best team in football this year, and FWIW, they are probably the healthiest theyve been all year. So potentially they could also be at their best. no guarantees, but better than saying X is limping and Y has a broken hand and Z.... Not thrilled by hanging my hat mostly on intangibles, but not worried about it either. - Bob M Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:49:12 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6157 Painter comment in #3 reminds me of a favorite line in the movie Ratatouille, said my a man to a rat as he proposes a partnership: "You know how to cook and I... know how to... appear human." - Bob M Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:38:37 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6155 The real difference is that the 05 Colts didn't play more than a handful of plays for more than a month. The 09 Colts played 14 games, and rested for about half of 15 and 16. Also, Roethlisberger > Flacco, and if anything the MSM slight is giving this team a nasty edge. - Monkey Business Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:26:01 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6154 that 2005 team was ridiculously good. losing the way they did made the next years team all the more special I guess. - torontocoltsfan Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:24:22 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6151 The Colts are reeling emotionally from giving up in such a messy way. They are wrong of course, but perception is reality. - BDiddy Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:19:23 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6146 The 2005 Colts faced 953 total plays. 398 rushes. The 2009 Colts faced 1084 total plays 467 rushes. - DZ Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:28:47 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6145 There's one big difference between then and now: Peyton's got a ring. The playoff pressure is now old hat to him and the team, and they've been there and done that before, which helps the veteran leadership. - ColtsHeadBen Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:47:32 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2010-archives/january/extending-the-metaphor.html#comment-6144 If the defense is on the field longer in '09 than in '05, then wouldn't they be giving up MORE yards because of it, not less? If I read you right, you are saying that fact lessens the disparity in yards allowed. I think it probably widens the gap, making the '09 defense that much better than the '05 defense. And, not a small difference, we don't have Mike Doss blowing coverages in '09. - Guy. Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:42:42 +0100