<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Behind Enemy Lines</title>
		<description>Comments for Behind Enemy Lines at http://www.18to88.com , comment 1 to 53 out of 20 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.18to88.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:57:51 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2847</link>
			<description>Ohhhhhhhhh THAT'S why it's interesting, because you don't know how good they are yet.

Now it makes sense.

I'm sorry, clearly I mistook what you meant. - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:38:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2846</link>
			<description>If I was judging the Pats team, you'd be right.  It would be stupid to say the Pats might not be good because they haven't faced any elite QBs.  Good thing that's not what I said at all.  Whew.

Instead, I was just noting that their SECONDARY which primarily defends PASSES hadn't faced an elite QB.  I said it was INTERESTING because I'm not sure we know one way or the other how good they are yet. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:29:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2845</link>
			<description>Have Demond or DZ compiled an 'interesting' list of the ratings of Quarterbacks you guys have played, or does that not fit their agenda?

This site is becoming a bigger joke every month.

I mean....you guys actually have 'Dittoheads' who tell you, regularly, how brilliant and well done all your writing is.

Even when it's just hack drivel, which it is most of the time.

You two bitches talk about how a QB isn't solely responsible for wins and losses - THAT'S THE MANTRA OF THIS SITE - then compile an 'interesting' list of QB rating for teams we've played.

 - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:03:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2843</link>
			<description>Funny you bring up Denver. You beat them, right?

I'm sorry, losing to a good team does not make you an elite team. It makes you a not so good team.  - gizzardfanny</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:49:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2811</link>
			<description>Baltimore doesn't have a winning record. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:26:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2810</link>
			<description>We played Baltimore and Denver too tough guy. - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:20:55 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2791</link>
			<description>[quote]who the f**k have you guys played? NOBODY![/quote]
More winning teams (Cardinals and Texans) than the Patriots (Falcons).

So if our schedule is weak and soft, that must mean the Patriots' is even weaker, right? - gizzardfanny</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:07:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2787</link>
			<description>I have about 13-15 that I'm planning on using. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:57:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2786</link>
			<description>Take it easy big guy.

Let's go back to football.

How many 'memories', aproximately, have you received since I wrote that to you wasted at 4:30 in the morning? - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:44:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2785</link>
			<description>By the way, I spend a good portion of every week having to convince people why hating Jews is evil.

Argentina really is crazy anti-Semitic.  It's not just a stereotype.  

It gets exhausting. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:21:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2784</link>
			<description>Thanks.  Didn't mean to freak.  

I just really love Jews. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:08:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2783</link>
			<description>Whoa!

Struck a nerve there.

I offer a sincere apology bro, you know most stuff with me is a joke, that included.

I retract it.....and won't go there again.

I, honestly, thought you'd chuckle at that.  I miscalculated and if you want to delete those posts please do.

Again, my apologies. - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:07:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2782</link>
			<description>I give you a lot of rope around here.

Don't ever, ever say that I hate Jews again.

If you were anyone else, I'd ban you for that.

Seriously.  That's the single most offensive thing you can say to me or about me.  

Make up whatever other crap you want.  I take Jew-hating seriously.  I don't get religious here often, but I consider it a vile offense before God Almighty Himself.  

Don't even joke with me about that. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:59:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PatP</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2781</link>
			<description>DZ is a narcissist.

He hates the Patriots to the point where the mere thought of them winning drives him to the point of total insanity.

He hates the fact that we've won more championships, that Tom Brady broke Manning's TD record (althought to be fair he did it in more attempts, kind of like Peyton Manning had a perfect regualr season in fewer games in 2004) and that our QB married Giselle.

He hates that Belichick is an atheist who doesn't bow down to the Lord Jesus Christ and still wins.

He's also a vehement Anti-Semite.

I made that last part up, but not really.  He's from Indiana and runs a Christian Missionary in Argentina......he hates Jews. - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:55:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2780</link>
			<description>Chuck rule?

You mean the Mel Blount rule?

That had been in effect since 78?

Or am I missing something? - AnHero</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:51:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2779</link>
			<description>Your contest is going great actually.  It was a really good idea.  I'm running it on Sunday.

As for the rest...we're about to find out. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:44:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2778</link>
			<description>You guys are all such bitches.

To the poster who asked if JC has mentioned, by name, the DB's that I liked.  The answer is yes.

Not only do I name them regualarly, but I also name where they were drafted.

DZ who the fuck have you guys played?  NOBODY!

I think it's 'interesting' that your whole schedule is weak, soft mush and we're gonna stomp your ass in your own park.

I never said we had a dominant secondary - but I HAVE been saying how much more athletic we are compared to years past and how we match up with Indy moreso this year than any team since 2003.

How's my contest coming along? - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:39:21 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2777</link>
			<description>This game is going to be absolutely awesome. Look at how much discussion is going on. Doesn't matter if it's not an important game for the Colts, playoff wise (which I disagree, the tie break is really important!), it's [b]the[/b] test for both teams. If the Colts lose the game, I can see every writer going on about how the Colts had an easy schedule and how their secondary is completely trashed and won't be able to stop any team from now on - nevermind that this secondary is the one that played the whole year. I also see the Colts leaving every single power rankings no 2 spot and going below 4th while the Patriots skyrocket. And last, but not least, everyone will blame this on Manning, of course.

No sir, this is not an unimportant game. This is about hating Tom Brady. This is hoping he crashes and burns. This is about Manning taking Brady's 3 superbowl rings and shoving them up his ass.

Can't wait for sunday night! - jpjandrade</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:39:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2770</link>
			<description>The Colts don't have a great secondary.  I never, not one time, said they did.

The Texans penalties were almost all on their defense. - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:18:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/november/behind-enemy-lines.html#comment-2769</link>
			<description>The mighty Matt Schaub. Interesting.

Wonder what the 13 penalties did and maybe the Colts and their great secondary would be 0-1 vs. that tremendous QB. Interesting. - PatP</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:12:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

