Comments for Eyes in the Backfield-Cardinals (full) at http://www.18to88.com , comment 1 to 8 out of 8 comments http://www.18to88.com Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:33:43 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/september/eyes-in-the-backfield-cardinals.html#comment-1243 I overlooked the "at" part of "playing at a team from another conference." My bad. - Guy. Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:37:04 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/september/eyes-in-the-backfield-cardinals.html#comment-1242 Yes. In four years, they'll play the Cards back in Indy (like 2005). They alternate the home/away. In 2017 they'll play in Arizona again. - DZ Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:59:08 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/september/eyes-in-the-backfield-cardinals.html#comment-1241 You sure about that 8-year thing? I thought it was 4. They play 1 cross-conference division each year for 4 years and then start over again (in the same order I think?). - Guy. Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:46:37 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/september/eyes-in-the-backfield-cardinals.html#comment-1236 Dude, Collinsworth! Be a man! Sack up and get an 'h' in there. - DZ Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:36:09 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/september/eyes-in-the-backfield-cardinals.html#comment-1235 It's CRIS Collinsworth, not CHRIS. Otherwise, an excellent preview!;D - JTBLA Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:12:26 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/september/eyes-in-the-backfield-cardinals.html#comment-1229 I know you've had this game marked as a lose, going back to your game by game prediction for the season. And after Miami... all your reasons are even more credible. Still... I just don't think Peyton will let Warner beat him. And while it is now up to Drew Brees to put up the fantasy numbers, at 33 years of age Manning has transcended to a place that perhaps only Joe Montana at the high of his powers has ever reached. - Doug England Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:55:55 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/september/eyes-in-the-backfield-cardinals.html#comment-1228 but I had this as a loss to. I hate to pick against Manning, but Cards 34 Colts 24 - dmstorm22 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:40:40 +0100 http://www.18to88.com/2009-archives/september/eyes-in-the-backfield-cardinals.html#comment-1221 Colts will win, but it may end upbeing a D win like a few notable games last year. Warner is a fumble machine when he gets rolling, and it's not just the DE he has to worry about; it's his own C. Small hands? You know what THAT means... that's right, fumbles! He tends to flub the ball just dropping back. Increased pressure can only help, of course. Our limping D is a huge concern, of course, but the DL is in pretty good shape. Maybe blitzing Freddie is better than dropping him back? One of their RBs has never caught an NFL pass--that's good news for us if KW needs a dump off option. It should be a close game and Vegas--which is more concerned with getting an even amount of wager money on both sides of a bet and NOT predicting outcomes--seems to have it about right at Cards -1. But in my gut I feel that the only way we lose this is if the Cards run for 150 and control the clock. I suspect we'll win the TO battle 3-1, and even if we have to come back late to win it, I have faith in these guys (both sides of the ball) like I had faith in Harbaugh back in 95. I know I am starting to sound like a sober raiderjoe, but... Hey, this Kool-Aid is great, you guys should have some.... - Bob M Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:56:07 +0100